Investigations
We examine concrete claims made about veterinary AI.
Independent veterinary AI evaluation
Big claims. Show the evidence.
Veterinary AI is moving faster than its evidence. We investigate the claims, review the science and test what actually works.
Editorial pillars
VetAI Trust is not primarily another benchmark website. Benchmarks are one tool inside a broader evidence and investigation program.
We examine concrete claims made about veterinary AI.
We review papers, validation studies and supporting evidence.
When existing evidence cannot answer the question, we test it.
New papers, products, model releases and industry developments - explained without the hype.
The rule
VetAI Trust separates unanswered questions from negative findings. A claim can be plausible, promising or useful while still needing independent evidence.
What we ask
These are generic examples, not claims attributed to any real company.
"Clinically validated."
By whom?
"Veterinary-specific AI."
Better than which frontier model?
"Never miss a charge."
What are recall and false-positive rates?
"Saves hours every day."
Compared with what baseline?
Free independent testing
Submission fees must not determine who gets tested or who appears in public comparisons. Testing does not guarantee publication or a positive result. Methodology and conflicts of interest will be disclosed.
Launch desk
Public articles will appear only when the underlying claim, paper, model or test can be described without inventing results.
Future claim checks will identify the claim, available evidence, independent support and unresolved questions.
Future paper checks will separate study design, dataset limits, endpoints and clinical relevance.
Future model notes will explain when veterinary-specific systems should be compared against general frontier models.
Future briefs will track relevant product, funding, regulatory and scientific developments without hype.
Future test notes will disclose task design, baselines, limits and conflict-of-interest handling.