Claim investigations

Marketing claims meet evidence review.

Investigations start with a specific claim, identify exactly what would make it true, then map the evidence that supports, limits or fails to answer it.

Claim checkLaunch placeholder

Claim selected, evidence pending

No vendor-specific claim investigation has been published yet. Future entries will distinguish the original claim from the evidence available to VetAI Trust.

Status: not publishedIndependent review required
Claim checkFormat

What a claim check will contain

Each review will state the claim, source type, evidence category, independent reproduction status and material caveats.

Test in progressQueue

When review becomes testing

If published evidence cannot answer a practical question, VetAI Trust may design an independent test with disclosed baselines and limits.

Submission fees do not decide inclusionSubmit

Investigation standard

Precise, fair and reproducible where possible.

Define the claim

We preserve the claim wording and context before interpreting what is being promised.

Map available evidence

Vendor materials, papers, validation studies and independent sources are separated rather than blended.

Identify what is missing

A missing independent replication is reported as an evidence gap, not as proof that the claim is false.

Publish with caveats

Findings disclose methodology, uncertainty and conflicts of interest.