No paid ranking
Vendors cannot buy a better score, preferred placement or favorable editorial conclusion.
Governance
VetAI Trust is not an AI vendor and does not sell ranking positions. Commercial relationships, vendor access and future funding must not decide evidence ratings, benchmark scores, publication decisions or editorial conclusions.
Vendors cannot buy a better score, preferred placement or favorable editorial conclusion.
Relevant funding, access, vendor cooperation and reviewer conflicts should be disclosed with public work.
Participation in a benchmark does not imply certification, approval or recommendation.
Editorial independence
Support, advertising, sponsorship, vendor participation or paid work may exist in the future, but they should never control what VetAI Trust ultimately publishes.
VetAI Trust may later disclose grants, sponsorship support or paid private evaluation work. If such support exists, editorial independence should remain explicit and visible wherever public findings might otherwise appear compromised.
This policy applies to Philipp Pusch, contributors, reviewers, sponsors and funders. Relevant funding, access, commercial relationships, advisory roles, vendor cooperation and testing participation should be disclosed where they matter to reader trust.
Evidence status may be revised when new peer-reviewed work appears, independent validation emerges, important methodological flaws are identified, vendor evidence changes or VetAI Trust performs its own test.
VetAI Trust is an independent evidence and evaluation initiative. It should not be described as an accredited certification authority unless that later becomes factually true.
"Not independently verified" does not mean "false." VetAI Trust does not accuse vendors of deception without evidence.
Connected policies
Governance sets the editorial rules. Methodology explains how claims are assessed. Corrections explains challenge and update flow. Data Policy explains benchmark integrity and result usage.