VetAI Trust

Research Radar

Continuous discovery. Human judgment.

Research Radar helps VetAI Trust notice meaningful veterinary-AI evidence and claim changes. It creates an editorial starting point—not a public verdict.

View latest evidence Read latest Claim Check Explore methodology

What the Radar watches

Signals across science and the market.

The goal is to identify changes worth examining while preserving the difference between a discovery and a verified conclusion.

Science

Scientific publications

New veterinary-AI papers and research records relevant to clinical or operational claims.

Validation

Validation studies

Evidence about datasets, comparators, uncertainty, external testing and clinical relevance.

Market

Vendors and products

Public product information that helps map which tools and tasks are entering veterinary practice.

Claims

Product claims

Specific public statements about performance, validation, accuracy, workflow or clinical benefit.

Change

Evidence changes

Meaningful shifts in claim wording, cited evidence or unresolved gaps that may change an assessment.

How discovery works

Two scouts, one editorial queue.

Automated assistance reduces the chance that a relevant signal is missed. Selection, verification and publication remain editorial decisions.

Paper Scout

Find potentially relevant research.

Paper Scout checks scientific sources for veterinary-AI publications, gathers public bibliographic information and flags work that may merit evidence review.

Discovery does not establish study quality, clinical value or independent verification.

Market Scout

Watch public products and claims.

Market Scout monitors selected public vendor and product information for new claims and material changes that may deserve closer examination.

A detected change is a lead. It is not an allegation or a finding.

From discovery to publication

Five steps, with a human gate.

Only selected findings move forward. Most signals remain monitoring context, become a review candidate or are set aside.

DiscoverTriageVerifyHuman reviewPublish

AI assists discovery and analysis. AI does not autonomously publish VetAI Trust conclusions. A named human decision is required before advanced approval states, and publication happens outside the automated Radar workflow.

Read the methodology

The content flywheel

A signal can become a useful public format.

Selection depends on the evidence, public importance and whether VetAI Trust can add a fair, well-sourced assessment.

01

Research Radar

Discover a paper, study, claim, market change or evidence gap.

03

Evidence gap

Name the unanswered practical question without treating missing verification as a negative result.

04

Test candidate

Consider an independent VetAI Trust test or benchmark where it could produce a useful answer.

No independent VetAI Trust test has been published yet. Tests and benchmarks are possible downstream research methods, not a claim that a result already exists.

Evidence review completeness

How good the evidence looks is not how fully we have reviewed it.

VetAI Trust tracks evidence quality separately from review completeness. A promising study design does not mean the full source has been read or independently fact-checked.

Metadata only

Title, authorship and bibliographic details are available.

Abstract reviewed

The reported summary has been examined, but important methods or limitations may be unavailable.

Full text extracted

The complete source is available for structured review.

Full text reviewed

Methods, results, limits, funding and relevant claims have received human review.

Independently fact-checked

Material statements and source mappings have received an additional verification step.

Explore published work

See what passed the gate.

Public assessments show their evidence boundaries, caveats and sources so readers can inspect the reasoning.